From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:19:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B828253.7040700@cygnus.com>
References: <3B80A6EF.7040108@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00172.html

> FYI,
> 
> I've finished overhalling it (ignoring a few cleanups).  If you find a broken link or the like, just check out:
> 
>     cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/gdb htdocs
> 
> and tweek.

Just FYI,

My current list of sugested cleanups:

	o	[download|cvs] or [download] [cvs] from ChrisF.
		Ok with me.  Any one got a preference?
		Should there be separate gdb/download and
		gdb/cvs directories? Probably not.  Hmm, then again
		it would allow a better separation of CVS(1)
		and official FTP.

	o	all the old stray assignment forms
		(Kevin, JimB will have the answer to
		your question but he is busy right now.
		It should be on the pages somewhere)

	o	rationalize the directories: documentation,
		onlinedocs, papers and talks.

	o	find out if someone has tried exploder
		along with other browsers (and a few WWW
		checkers) on it.  I've tried mozilla,
		netscape and lynx.

	o	simplify further the update process,
		a Makefile or something in CVS, er
		mumble muble, security risk, mumble,

	o	re-audit and again try to reduce
		the number of ``Red Hat''s :-)


Andrew

(1) I can see the day when ``cvs'' will be a link to the ``subversion'' 
repository ... :-)