From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Erland Lewin <erl@voxi.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Difficulty for community involvment in gdb
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 13:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B686235.30809@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B684397.40704@voxi.com>
Just FYI,
When I went to close your two bug reports the first thing I did was try
to find the SID bug-tracking system so that I could point you at it.
Unfortunatly that doesn't exist. Looking at the e-mail exchange it
would appear you were unfortunatly given the impression that this was a
GDB problem which it isn't, sigh.
> It is now possible to automatically configure and build a variety of
> tools with one command. To build all of the tools contained herein,
> run the ``configure'' script here, e.g.:
I'll try to clarify the comment in that file.
One thing that would help though. What lead you to check out both SID
and GDB in a single source tree? I'm guessing that this is documented
somewhere and hence, would like to locate that documentation so that
those responsible can be informed of the problems you encountered.
> So to a newcomer to this stuff, it would seem that bdf, sid etc are
> "part of gdb". It's quite difficult to get started with the cvs.
> Additionally, the gnats interface is IMHO not as good as bugzilla.
> The only thing I can do, not being a developer, seems to be to
> create bug reports; I can't add comments to them.
> I think little problems like the ones I'm having inhibit the
> advantage that gdb could get from greater community involvment. What
> I'm really trying to do is to get gdb to work better with threads
> under Linux. This has been a problem for several years (I
> contributed a patch for this about two years ago). I think the time
> it takes for these things to get fixed will be longer if it is more
> difficult for people to get involved.
Regarding Linux threads, you may want to just download/build a current
GDB. More bugs then are worth mentioning have been fixed.
With PRMS vs Bugzilla, it is a decision we live with. I think the time
to review it is when GDB+BINUITLS get merged with GCC. If you would
like a gnats account that can be arranged.
Andrew
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-01 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-01 11:00 Erland Lewin
2001-08-01 13:10 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-08-02 4:36 ` Erland Lewin
2001-08-02 8:05 ` Keith Seitz
2001-08-02 9:16 ` DJ Delorie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B686235.30809@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=erl@voxi.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox