From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Warno To: Christopher Faylor Cc: GDB Mailing List Subject: Re: About those test messages Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 06:18:00 -0000 Message-id: <3B49AF17.E5B90790@valaran.com> References: <20010705170545.473D246894@lenard.microcelli5.com> <20010705131604.B24400@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00078.html > I considered blocking image attachments after that idiocy but it > occurred to me that people occasionally post screen shots of problems so > I couldn't make a unilateral decision to block images. > > If the consensus is that no one wants to ever see any kind of images, > though, I can either bounce or strip them. > > Should we vote? > > cgf I'd say bouncing messages with images is the better way to go so that the sender clearly knows images aren't allowed in posts. As for those who post screen shots of problems, it may be a little more work for them but I'm sure they could figure out how to send it off to a website and post a URL to such an image rather than the image itself. This is better than getting one's butt flamed by a conservative superior at the workplace. :/ -- | Keith Warno cell: +1 609-209-5800 | http://www.valaran.com/ work: +1 609-716-7200 x243 | Valaran Corporation Penguin Guy SMS : kw-mobile@valaran.com +--------------------------------------------------------------//