From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: GDB Discussion <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: 5.1 Release criteria (with patch)
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 10:35:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B47485E.9040100@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00059.html

Hello,

I've applied a knife to the 5.1 release criteria - there is one thing 
left to do.

Among the things I've allowed to fall off (or not climb on) the back of 
the cart:

	o	targets CRIS, s390, mips-linux

		Here, I think all the generic problems
		have been addressed so the remaining
		patches should just drop in.

		If they squeeze into 5.1 then cool if not
		then oops

	o	sparc/linux

		here to, to be honest, I'm not sure what the
		status is.  I do know the GNU/Linux/SPARC64
		patches need more work.

Andrew
>From chastain@cygnus.com Sat Jul 07 10:44:00 2001
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: 5.1 Release criteria (with patch)
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 10:44:00 -0000
Message-id: <200107071645.JAA16457@bosch.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00060.html
Content-length: 454

native hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 does not build.  See PR gdb/63:

  http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&databse=gdb&pr=63
  "build failure, native hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20, no_shared_libraries"

native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 probably also has this problem.  Right now
it has an ltconfig problem standing in front so I can't see.

I don't know if "hpux gdb builds" merits a place in TODO or not,
that's the release manager's decision.

MichaelC