From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: GDB Discussion <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [mi] Revised breakpoint table output
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:39:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B266FDA.2090401@cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010612115011.1700P-100000@is>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00092.html

> On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> 
>> Following on the revisions to the MI output, the breakpoint table, under 
>> the list/tuple schema ends up looking like:
>> 
>> 201-break-list
>> 201^done,BreakpointTable={hdr=[{width="3",alignment="-1",colname="number",colhdr
>> ="Num"},{width="14",alignment="-1",colname="type",colhdr="Type"},{width="4",alig
>> nment="-1",colname="disp",colhdr="Disp"},{width="3",alignment="-1",colname="enab
>> led",colhdr="Enb"},{width="10",alignment="-1",colname="addr",colhdr="Address"},{
>> width="40",alignment="2",colname="what",colhdr="What"}],body=[]}
> 
> 
> Sorry for being a nag, but please remember to update the relevant
> parts of gdbmi.texinfo.  It shows the format and actual examples of
> output for many commands.


Yes, I know :-).  I need to be careful that the code, doc and testsuite 
all get updated.  I think I'm actually ready to start submitting patches 
(which means, gasp, I can start on the gdbint.texinfo and s390).

	Andrew