From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: prgregset_t vs gdb_gregset_t on Linux: not the same!
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:48:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B24CC3B.8070407@cygnus.com>
References: <20010608132730.A4056@nevyn.them.org> <20010608155907.A21698@nevyn.them.org> <20010608221452.B3344@lucon.org> <3B22492E.5020908@cygnus.com> <20010610002356.A1938@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00073.html

> # make
> gcc -M -I. foo.c
> foo.o: foo.c tm.h mips/tm-linux.h
> gcc -M -I. foo.c -DFIXED 
> foo.o: foo.c tm.h mips/tm-linux.h tm-linux.h
>  
> Did I miss something here?


Actually no. I'm wrong on this count.

Any way, back to the original tm-littlemips.h file:

> #ifndef TM_MIPSLITTLELINUX_H
> #define TM_MIPSLITTLELINUX_H
> 
> #define TARGET_BYTE_ORDER LITTLE_ENDIAN
> 
> #include "mips/tm-linux.h"


both the little and big endian GNU/Linux/MIPS targets should use a 
single config/mips/tm-linux.h file.  The code no longer needs to define 
TARGET_BYTE_ORDER.

With regard to #include "tm-linux.h", I'd mimic *bsd.  That way it is 
clear exactly what is going on.  Regardless of the semantics of "" vs <>.

	Andrew