From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: DOS/Windows-specific code: values.c
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 08:33:00 -0000
Message-id: <3AF9C8AF.4090205@cygnus.com>
References: <20010503211502.21716.qmail@web6401.mail.yahoo.com> <3AF1DAA0.3060702@cygnus.com> <200105071609.TAA24129@is.elta.co.il> <200105081155.OAA06330@is.elta.co.il> <1010509065838.ZM22280@ocotillo.lan>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00217.html

> On May 8,  2:55pm, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> 
>> * values.c:unpack_double()
>> 
>> /* Unsigned -- be sure we compensate for signed LONGEST.  */
>> #if !defined (_MSC_VER) || (_MSC_VER > 900)
>> return (ULONGEST) unpack_long (type, valaddr);
>> #else
>> /* FIXME!!! msvc22 doesn't support unsigned __int64 -> double */
>> return (LONGEST) unpack_long (type, valaddr);
>> #endif /* _MSC_VER */
>> 
>> There's _got_ to be a better way to do this!
> 
> 
> Is this even an issue any longer?  I.e, is the version of MSC being
> catered to by the above ifdefs still in widespread use?

To follow up Chris's comment.  Yes, the code is dead but for a different 
reason.  This is probably yet another hang over from WinGDB.

	Andrew