From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: GDB Discussion <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AB1024E.5F4123B0@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AA149E4.3B6AAFA8@cygnus.com>
> trunk: gdb-YYYYMMDD (gdb-20010229)
> branch: gdb-B.B.B-YYYYMMDD (gdb-5.0.90-20010229)
It appears that the consensus is with this one. Any further comment?
MichaelC expressed concern over being able to differentiate between a
CVS gdb-20010229 and a snapshot gdb-20010229. Yes, they can differ
significantly.
That would mean that something like:
$ gdb
GNU gdb 4.17
will become
$ gdb
GNU gdb 20010229 (cvs)
and GNU gdb 5.0.90-20010229 (snap)
or GNU gdb 20010229-cvs
and GNU gdb 5.0.90-20010229
assuming no further comment, I'm going to toss a coin and then choose
the second one :-)
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-21 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-16 8:07 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-16 8:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-06-12 14:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-16 8:46 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-16 9:54 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-16 11:02 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-16 12:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-16 11:29 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-16 11:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-16 11:57 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-16 12:16 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-16 12:29 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-02-16 12:43 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-16 12:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-16 13:34 ` Stan Shebs
2001-02-16 14:30 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-17 10:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-16 12:21 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-03-21 15:59 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-06-12 14:46 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-06-13 7:32 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AB1024E.5F4123B0@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox