From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fernando Nasser To: cygwin@cygwin.com, insight@sources.redhat.com Cc: GDB , ischis2@home.com Subject: Re: Insight 5.0 bug? Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:59:00 -0000 Message-id: <3AAD233D.AF9B5BC0@redhat.com> References: <3AACF058.2C212032@home.com> <3AAD0649.70CFEEAB@redhat.com> <3AAD0B1D.5D949B1E@home.com> <20010312133638.A10352@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00101.html Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:45:01AM -0700, Stephen Smith wrote: > >Ok. Or should a new version number be assigned? > > I do append the snapshot date to the version number. I really can't > invent a version number. I have to use whatever is in CVS. > AFAIK this is the right way of doing it. Having the date allows whoever is looking into a problem to determine if the code already has a fix or not, for one thing. There was some talking into removing the release version string from the CVS file in the GDB list recently. This will further avoid any misleading references. -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9