From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Marsden <emarsden@mail.dotcom.fr>, GDB Discussion <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: conditional traps on powerpc
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:02:00 -0000
Message-id: <3A91A5AA.FF11ED9C@cygnus.com>
References: <wziy9v2z65l.fsf@mail.dotcom.fr> <3A919E78.A2BE2D83@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00262.html

Fernando Nasser wrote:

> W.r.t the signal processing, gdb has commands that let you decide what
> to do with signals received by the program being debugged.  You may
> choose to "pass" them.  If I am not mistaken, this would only apply to
> the SIGTRAPs that have been already determined not to be caused by a
> breakpoint.

Yes, that is correct.
Mind you, I'm not sure what the kernel will do when it is told to
deliver a SIGTRAP to a program already being debugged.

	Andrew