From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>, jtc@redback.com, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:44:00 -0000
Message-id: <3A8D9020.DC8566EF@cygnus.com>
References: <200102161928.LAA00929@bosch.cygnus.com> <5mhf1u9z9y.fsf@jtc.redback.com> <1010216201646.ZM12268@ocotillo.lan> <14989.36272.996420.519178@kwikemart.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00240.html

Elena Zannoni wrote:

> Etc. Etc.
> 
> I am in favour of 5.0.1, which is consistent with what we did in the
> past.

FYI,

With !*@($&)(!*@ C++ 3.0, there is very likely going to be a real GDB
5.1.1 :-)

	Andrew