From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Discussion <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gdb_expect and default{} vs timeout{}
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:45:00 -0000
Message-id: <3A8D57F0.30BE78A0@cygnus.com>
References: <3A8B69C1.D059D535@cygnus.com> <3A8CCDD5.32AF948D@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00217.html

Fernando Nasser wrote:

> Sorry for the delay.

This is definitly far from urgent.  Thanks for the answer :-)

> You are right, this is sort of weird.
> 
> "default" is equivalent to `"eof" or "timeout"'.
> 
> If you want to do the same thing in both "eof" and "timeout" conditions,
> then use "default" instead (just to save typing).

Ah! OK.

> I don't think the code above, although redundant, will cause any harm.
> Probably the default clause will take precedence for being specified
> first, so the timeout clause is never used.

Yes, that is what I saw.  I was getting the default case rather than
timeout case printed when a timeout occured.

	Andrew