From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>
To: Yu Xuanwei <yxw@chinacluster.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Remote Debugging
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A27FEB1.E3AA550C@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A274495.FD07A793@chinacluster.com>
Yu Xuanwei wrote:
>
> Hi, Folks:
>
> I am a rookie. I want to know something about remote debugging:
>
> 1. On target: The gdbserver manipulates target application, which is
> stripped.
>
> 2. On host: GDB run "target remote ..." to customize the target.
>
> Then where is the symbol file for target application? Should I native
> compile the target application on host? Or ...?
>
Nope. You cross compile your executable with "-g". Create a stripped copy
(not necessary if you don't care about file sizes in the target) and copy
the stripped version to the target. Load it with gdbserver.
On the host side: gdb <your-complete-executable-with-debug-info>
and proceed as you mentioned.
But please, before you try to go any further, print a copy of the
"Debugging with GDB" manual. It is in the doc directory (you can make it in
various flavors - ps among them). It is also available as an info topic
if GDB is correctly installed on your system.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
From Denset.Serralta@radisys.com Fri Dec 01 11:55:00 2000
From: Denset.Serralta@radisys.com
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB does not step into or over "sleep" function
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:55:00 -0000
Message-id: <OF9A6588DE.02D8BDD2-ON852569A8.006B6937@radisys.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-12/msg00004.html
Content-length: 3359
Jim Blandy
<jimb@zwingli.cygn To: Denset.Serralta@radisys.com
us.com> cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Sent by: Subject: Re: GDB does not step into or over "sleep" function
gdb-owner@sources.
redhat.com
11/28/00 08:07 PM
Jim Blandy wrote:
>Let me make sure I understand. If you have code like this:
>
> ... some code ...
> ProcessSleep (...);
> ... some more code ...
>
>and you set a breakpoint on the `some more code' line, your program
>hangs and never reaches the breakpoint.
>But if you run the program without GDB, it sleeps the expected amount
>of time, and then continues normally.
Thanks for responding
You are correct. The breakpoint in "...some more code ..." is never
reached. We are suspecting
at the moment that it is a problem with the ProcessSleep function since the
hang occurrs when we
'step into' or 'step over' it. What we don't know is whether it is a
problem with our underlying kernel
functions or whether GDB has a problem with a "sleep" function which
allocates a semaphore,
blocks on it subject to a user specified timeout and then returns the
semaphore. We are leaning
to suspecting that it is a problem with our custom kernel (i.e. GDB is
innocent). However I thought
I would ask the GDB group, with all the combined experience developing GDB,
just in case they
saw something obvious.
Thanks again
Denset.Serralta@radisys.com
>Denset.Serralta@radisys.com writes:
>> We are using GDB 4.18 on an NT host to debug target software running on
a
>> PowerPC based adapter. We are using a function called ProcessSleep which
is
>> a call to our kernel. It basically allocates a semaphore, blocks on it
>> subject to a user specified timeout and then returns the semaphore.One
>> problem we can't seem to get around though is that if the process being
>> debugged makes a 'ProcessSleep' call, the debugger never gains control
when
>> we step over it. Even if we set a breakpoint past the call and let it
run,
>> it never returns. A status utility that we have shows the process as
>> queued, but we never regain control. Does anybody know any reason(s)
why
>> this should happen.
next parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-01 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3A274495.FD07A793@chinacluster.com>
2000-12-01 11:40 ` Fernando Nasser [this message]
2015-03-07 13:52 Remote debugging Russell Shaw
2015-03-07 14:09 ` Ofir Cohen
2015-03-08 7:48 ` Russell Shaw
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-22 14:23 luca risso
2004-03-19 17:59 luca risso
2004-03-19 18:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-13 14:24 remote debugging nak26
2003-06-13 7:50 Brijesh Shukla
2003-06-13 13:28 ` Quality Quorum
2003-03-20 7:45 Patricia Alba
2002-12-12 9:29 Remote Debugging Tim
2002-12-12 10:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22 9:35 remote debugging Vinayak P Risbud
2001-01-23 22:23 malar kavi
[not found] <38B4017A.2F64A9C3@Epec.fi>
2000-02-23 19:12 ` Remote Debugging Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A27FEB1.E3AA550C@cygnus.com \
--to=fnasser@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=yxw@chinacluster.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox