Re: gdb/regcache.c:211: undefined reference to `GET_SAVED_REGISTER'

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

Mine.  Will fix.

	Andrew
From kettenis@wins.uva.nl Fri Aug 11 11:10:00 2000
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
To: aj@suse.de, ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: gdb/regcache.c:211: undefined reference to `GET_SAVED_REGISTER'
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:10:00 -0000
Message-id: <200008111810.e7BIAQS09455@delius.kettenis.local>
References: <u8k8dof7ah.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>
X-SW-Source: 2000-08/msg00058.html
Content-length: 1033

   From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
   Date: 11 Aug 2000 11:58:46 +0200

   By default (!GDB_MULTI_ARCH && !GET_SAVED_REGISTER) no replacement is
   defined.

Looks like Andrew accidentiliy removed the GET_SAVED_REGISTER stuff
from regcache.c (there's no ChangeLog for that bit).  The attached
patch restores it.  Andrew, I'll leave it to you to check it in and
put an appropriate notice in the ChangeLog :-).

Mark


Index: regcache.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/regcache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 regcache.c
--- regcache.c	2000/08/11 03:19:22	1.7
+++ regcache.c	2000/08/11 18:08:21
@@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ default_get_saved_register (char *raw_bu
     *addrp = addr;
 }
 
+#if !defined (GET_SAVED_REGISTER)
+#define GET_SAVED_REGISTER(raw_buffer, optimized, addrp, frame, regnum, lval) \
+  default_get_saved_register(raw_buffer, optimized, addrp, frame, regnum, lval)
+#endif
+
 void
 get_saved_register (char *raw_buffer,
 		    int *optimized,
From guo@cup.hp.com Fri Aug 11 11:11:00 2000
From: Jimmy Guo <guo@cup.hp.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: gdb linux testing regressions (compared to 7/24)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:11:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008111110050.807-100000@hpcll168.cup.hp.com>
References: <200008111804.e7BI4kx09433@delius.kettenis.local>
X-SW-Source: 2000-08/msg00059.html
Content-length: 267

>I probably should have asked for the Linux *kernel* version (uname
>-a).  If you're running Linux 2.0.x, the failures you're seeing would
>be pretty normal.

% uname -a
Linux hpcll168.cup.hp.com 2.2.5-15smp #1 SMP Mon Apr 19 22:43:28 EDT
1999 i686 unknown

- Jimmy