Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Proposal: convert function definitions to prototyped form
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 18:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <394589D8.8A61FECD@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1000602075018.ZM29997@ocotillo.lan>

Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
> As many of you know, I'm in the midst of purging the use of ``PARAMS''
> in prototyped function declarations from the gdb sources.  After this
> activity is concluded, I'd like to begin converting function
> definitions whose parameters are declared using the traditional C
> style to the ISO C prototyped form.  I.e, I'd like to convert
> functions of the form

Kevin,

Would a fair summary of this be that you've encountered the following
road blocks:

	o	indent.pro

		So that indent gives better results


	o	a drain of some of the backlog of
		patches (pascal I believe is now
		going in).

		Apple and HP?

No one has objected to the principal (well not on gdb-patches :-) and
the tool would be based on perl rather than the the gcc thing.

Once those blockages are cleared, it can be scheduled and can go
through?

	Andrew
From shebs@apple.com Mon Jun 12 18:15:00 2000
From: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>, Eric Bachalo <ebachalo@redhat.com>, gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Proposal: convert function definitions to prototyped form
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 18:15:00 -0000
Message-id: <39458A9E.239C8A81@apple.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006121802590.29924-100000@propylaea.anduin.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-06/msg00103.html
Content-length: 374

Daniel Berlin wrote:
> 
> Funny you guys bring up the number of types in GDB.
> According to the debug info, there are >82,000.
> How exactly are we counting them, again?

Since GDB sources are around 400K lines or so, it's highly unlikely
that there is a type definition for every five lines in the
C sources.  You're seeing duplicates in the debug info, presumably.

Stan
From dan@cgsoftware.com Mon Jun 12 18:23:00 2000
From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>, Eric Bachalo <ebachalo@redhat.com>, gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Proposal: convert function definitions to prototyped form
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 18:23:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006121815430.29924-100000@propylaea.anduin.com>
References: <39458A9E.239C8A81@apple.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-06/msg00104.html
Content-length: 643

Before my patches to eliminate duplicate dwarf2 info, it said there were
120k. 
So something isn't adding up here. 
I find it hard to believe we duplicate that much info.
It's pretty much absurd.
--Dan

On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Stan Shebs wrote:

> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > 
> > Funny you guys bring up the number of types in GDB.
> > According to the debug info, there are >82,000.
> > How exactly are we counting them, again?
> 
> Since GDB sources are around 400K lines or so, it's highly unlikely
> that there is a type definition for every five lines in the
> C sources.  You're seeing duplicates in the debug info, presumably.
> 
> Stan
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-06-12 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1000602075018.ZM29997@ocotillo.lan>
2000-06-02  5:26 ` Mark Kettenis
     [not found]   ` <1000602151553.ZM30578@ocotillo.lan>
     [not found]     ` <5mya4om115.fsf@jtc.redback.com>
     [not found]       ` <3938F700.509FD4AA@cygnus.com>
2000-06-05 11:05         ` J.T. Conklin
     [not found] ` <3937816C.E66B9AE0@cygnus.com>
2000-06-03  0:13   ` Kevin Buettner
2000-06-12 18:10 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2000-06-12 19:48   ` Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=394589D8.8A61FECD@cygnus.com \
    --to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=kevinb@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox