From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14364 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 18:27:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14346 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 18:27:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out2.apple.com) (17.254.0.51) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 18:27:22 -0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (A17-129-100-225.apple.com [17.129.100.225]) by mail-out2.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h0MIRLI05014; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:27:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from scv2.apple.com (scv2.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:27:21 -0800 Received: from apple.com (inghji.apple.com [17.201.22.240]) by scv2.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h0MIRKQ15452; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:27:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:27:00 -0000 Subject: Re: gdb Digest 22 Jan 2003 10:11:55 -0000 Issue 1070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com To: gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com From: Jim Ingham In-Reply-To: <1043230315.13426.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> Message-Id: <35427ACC-2E37-11D7-B17A-00039379E320@apple.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 Andrew, On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 02:11 AM, gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote: >> Personally, I'd like to see Emacs switch from annotation level 1 to >> MI, too; then we could get rid of annotation altogether. But I think >> it makes sense to tackle level 2 first, since I don't think it has >> many users (if any). > > Yes. RMS has previously inidicated his liking of the idea of having > EMACS use MI. The lack of a console was identified as a technical > barrier to that change :-/ > > Andrew You of course knew this, but if/when Keith's interpreter's patches make it in, this will be close to solved. One remaining bit is that we need an mi "-interpreter-complete string" command that hands the "string" argument to the cli command line completer and returns the result(s) of the completion. That is necessary to implement tab behavior. That is on my list of things to add, though it is lower than some others that I have to deliver, so I am not sure when I will get to it. Other than that, the PB console works fairly well... Jim -- Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com Developer Tools Apple Computer