From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24523 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2003 20:39:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24510 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2003 20:39:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gollum.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2003 20:39:35 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.143.216]) by gollum.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id BSU76412; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:39:03 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:39:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <3405-Thu30Oct2003223309+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20031030194411.GA2786@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:44:11 -0500) Subject: Re: Multiple locations vs. watchpoints. Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20031030055345.GA7588@nevyn.them.org> <20031030194411.GA2786@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:44:11 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > And when neither of these functions is in the "current" file I guess in that case we should ask the user which one does she mean. > We tend to get one at random. That sounds like a bug (from the user point of view).