From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ZrKaBwnmL2qpOQgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:46:17 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0DAF21E024; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:46:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:6:3111::32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177861E024 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:46:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA264BA23C3 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:46:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6CA264BA23C3 Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAF764B9DB48; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:39:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DAF764B9DB48 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org DAF764B9DB48 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=45.83.234.184 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1781523571; cv=none; b=aMK+jwf5Kb5yGZalmGShjbe2M2iU2hmUzbVNrHQ96/gzxI/8Uc3HUWnb8N3krZetwJQee5f6aQNUAtfSx4sREaNY8w1usYRgASW9UjGE0FOdhss/VXdiJdNBCuScA8Y+AfPy7INtm9BgEQvz9d56Ge0oVfsaDTAczik71i27n4o= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1781523571; c=relaxed/simple; bh=apFIjnWSaxMiqJe/quDI8G3kptDv3t4/inSTngjNUPA=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=XeK2pMiYI95d3BwY0Tgv6eTWaQqM4J0wvoBXWhCl1TKSnECpO2P94ePzqZmpAVYzE3sT50870wOwX+8GHNXYJ3fAbKi+R9nHd7RsQ/5CQlBAH4dEpuG/GqJLLSTWh87KnthX4l+C79GVYOBpQK1vWsVFDK1QDT+4ovE72ZW8ILY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DAF764B9DB48 Received: from 9950x.localdomain (82-217-174-174.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [82.217.174.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1E4C3032F85; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by 9950x.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 903BEAA0080; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <32efa4408237f7c0c19be0aa79c8f75a2df6e2ab.camel@klomp.org> Subject: Re: Nominations for =?UTF-8?Q?Anthropic=E2=80=99s?= Claude for Open Source program From: Mark Wielaard To: Andrew Pinski , Adhemerval Zanella Netto Cc: Carlos O'Donell , glibc developers , gdb developers Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:39:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <5c2e18dd-807c-4331-b12c-a5b17b256f5b@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.2 (3.60.2-1.fc44) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi, On Fri, 2026-06-12 at 16:11 -0700, Andrew Pinski via Gdb wrote: > All of this talk about llm and llm reviews is off-topic for this list. > Including the original email is off-topic and should not have been sent. Agreed, promoting the use of a commercial, non-free, proprietary llm through a saas model is not appropriate and off-topic for the GNU development lists. > Carlos, > Can you step down from the llm gcc working group for this email since i= t > shows a conflict of interest of prompting one product. Plus it shows poo= r > taste of sending out an email about a non free product to a mailing list > about glibc development. > Can I also ask you to step down from CoC for violating the CoC here? Yeah. It is hard to not see a pattern here. But not sure it is enough for banning someone. And we all make mistakes from time to time. But we do want to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. Cheers, Mark