From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-38338-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4294 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2010 10:29:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 4252 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2010 10:29:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.17.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:29:26 +0000
Received: from igor (brln-4db90099.pool.mediaWays.net [77.185.0.153])	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis)	id 0MLiSZ-1PLHxi3n9f-000Jcc; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:29:22 +0100
Message-ID: <3278F49FBE754FAE8F7A6A2AFCF26DD9@igor>
Reply-To: =?Windows-1252?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <lionhead@onlinehome.de>
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <gschroeder@onlinehome.de>
To: <gdb@sourceware.org>
References: <C2489EECC5ED4C33ACE3F0164C8BEC5E@igor> <m3y68j214m.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <E7E3B2A3F11D407299DA8B013461DF5A@igor>
Subject: Re: Breakpoint troubles on typedefs
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:29:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	format=flowed;	charset="Windows-1252";	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2

Martin Schröder wrote:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Schröder <gschroeder@onlinehome.de> writes:
>>
>>> I seem to have found a bug / feature in GDB 7.2 for C++. The
>>> problem is that typedefs are not converted to their base type
>>> when one tries to set a breakpoint into a function that has a
>>> typedef'd type as Martin> parameter.
>>>
>>> Could you file this in GDB's bugzilla?
>>>
>>> A group of us are actively working on C++-related problems in
>>> GDB. It is best for us if bugs are in bugzilla so we don't miss
>>> any.
>
> Sure, will do so tomorrow (it's past midnight where I hail from).
>

Here's the link to the bugzilla entry:

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12266


So long,
    Martin.