From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23217 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2006 17:34:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 23207 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2006 17:34:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:34:00 +0000 Received: from relay8.apple.com (a17-128-113-38.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6CHWOjF001802; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [17.201.22.240] (unknown [17.201.22.240]) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 48D3E4B3; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:34:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nick Roberts , Vladimir Prus , gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Jim Ingham In-Reply-To: <20060712140431.GA18249@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: mi_load_progress question References: <200607121239.07906.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <17588.49586.825386.426144@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060712140431.GA18249@nevyn.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v821) Message-Id: <317FC758-DAF1-4EFC-968E-0C5DB0C134A3@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.821) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 I haven't thought about this case specifically, because we don't use the "load" command - Xcode only supports native debuggers at present... But in general, anything that might affect the UI should emit some kind of notification when done through -interpreter-exec. If you had a little "load progress meter" it would be a bug if clicking the "load" button caused the meter to update, but typing "load" at the CLI didn't. So I would say yes. Jim On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:04 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Second question: Should typing "-interpreter-exec console load" issue > +download updates? Currently it does the same as "load" and > that's the right thing to do so this is the same as the first > question. > > Jim, maybe you've got an opinion on this? Apple seems to make more > use > of the CLI support than anyone else :-) >