From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32334 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2011 15:31:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 32315 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2011 15:31:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sam.nabble.com (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:31:11 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4asw-0005wL-OY for gdb@sourceware.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:31:10 -0700 Message-ID: <31268868.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:31:00 -0000 From: BarrRobot To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MI Interface - interpretation of value returned by -stack-list-locals (C++) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <31246347.post@talk.nabble.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2 Thanks. It would have been nice to avoid the round trip of another call (or many) to do all the necessary varobjs, so it looks as if I shall chicken out and present it 'as is' for expediency at this stage. One for the wish-list maybe? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/MI-Interface---interpretation-of-value-returned-by--stack-list-locals-%28C%2B%2B%29-tp31246347p31268868.html Sent from the Sourceware - gdb list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.