From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id NieYDrl/01+cZQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:18:33 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 345341F0A9; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:18:33 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804C21E552 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:18:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DC7389202D; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:18:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 33DC7389202D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1607696312; bh=hS84ImJDNPQc0YksqPCRve6CAB+un7CIjbQT/kFc6MM=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=fcJeckI95K/kO0kyS6T+2W2RxnnVadMG3LDNIScYRnQXLC0mkq2ShJddNR06Yaz2+ npdnNFqPXzSZia9CY5XCFEiIPRq6t6ZkNDa6FmZyDZani7GcTkLRxhZbHrsVKnShpj 22zHRRe6dC23o7EgepefILohl1/dWEP/GVr86t58= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97014385480A for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:18:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 97014385480A Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 0BBEIKbQ027671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:18:24 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 0BBEIKbQ027671 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADF6A1E552; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:18:19 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Do we still support DICOS? To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Benedek?= , "gdb@sourceware.org" , "luis.machado@linaro.org" References: Message-ID: <2f11e8e6-10b4-0a45-8e18-bcc32073c508@polymtl.ca> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:18:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:18:20 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2020-12-11 4:34 a.m., László Benedek via Gdb wrote: > Hi all, > > I am an Ericsson engineer working on a product that is the next version in the evolution of Dicos. This GDB support is still actively used in our products in Ericsson. > If it is possible please do not remove it from GDB. > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Laszlo Benedek > Ericsson > > p.s.: I am not a subscriber on the gdb mail list, I was notified about this discussion. If you'd like to answer please cc me directly. > Ok, thanks for the notice, that helps us know that it is still relevant. There hasn't been any contribution related to Dicos in a while, so we weren't sure. If you stumble on any problem, don't hesitate to try to contribute fixes upstream, that way we know that the platform is being used (and you don't have to maintain patches on the side). For others, here's the original thread: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/2020-September/048925.html Simon