From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id PS4ROzZAtWoBTT0AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:22:30 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gotplt.org header.i=@gotplt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dreamhost header.b=jkUxtxcE; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C708D1E01F; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:22:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFC51E01F for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:22:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882E546A928B for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:22:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 882E546A928B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gotplt.org header.i=@gotplt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dreamhost header.b=jkUxtxcE Received: from firebrick.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (firebrick.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.59]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D97A447BAD5F; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:21:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D97A447BAD5F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gotplt.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gotplt.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D97A447BAD5F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=23.83.222.59 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1790263283; cv=none; b=A8qFRBenbPPBJEXWJXPXllu+juSy+6NOfN5woN4HOdQE4Ac2rGQ+X5g/YyR5xwh0KjZi3/VX1QkNbLVKp66ZUyUB0pwvJJtG141HfGV3Tx8Lpgm9lREPwx9toiTeB5Ap3XZkL7tW1Vg2J9jUWIwe2ixHb2g2caO42hWX7EqQEUU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1790263283; c=relaxed/simple; bh=52mC4mhCk1mY4UHihCHwMMyWTeVtrD9+/RsySb2Iy7Q=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To; b=SxbEZ23x4sJZoNmGIKPUzmPpC+qWXuNyKL5zrMcxgreefIBG1EnaMDL6B+jwSR7E15xCLlrzJzZtF1fP0T/10SLsoK/Wt8Wo0VlP4Zko18FRLj1+S1LFD5mAy2C5aYzhy3fTLrrRXI2ffoPLA3ACHcrYJhzUDhywn0er1qpJG3U= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gotplt.org header.i=@gotplt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dreamhost header.b=jkUxtxcE DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D97A447BAD5F X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDA9462F88; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a253.dreamhost.com (trex-green-9.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.21.120]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6AE1A460FDC; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:21:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Shrill-Occur: 4fa44b0642312b47_1790263281468_972434858 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1790263281468:3183160787 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1790263281468 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a253.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.96.21.120 (trex/8.0.2); Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:21:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.8.195] (unknown [38.74.41.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: siddhesh@gotplt.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a253.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4hrHbs4lYzzylN; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:21:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gotplt.org; s=dreamhost; t=1790263274; bh=TL8okhTUiJdAlinetkyHQGV4sFZWBpVFTNPjAYeuQ9Q=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jkUxtxcE/dtJ0jWVkMHaR+4qGxiM3c0QEwNMIoC33JSmREFryaJfs/T0VJLWWOG8B 5y0EKhPIGj0aK8LqeUXL+MbK04jR+VKA8rfArXK16I3IqufVN1W8srmi5BjOTW+UYv zgdDv/oqKL0uo5MZnbVNAPVvhjDH2qSRqQVzpL0x05PiGu5IBq6XC408gRoyotVEQg Fk9NBRhZaBHbBXZpXit3awjiSuVpFx6RFwoTvcAi4Cfu/1Ll1nglfC73vbrhES5EFZ BRRYrOVJhSE8RGFnRLYwKoi0uS8U1qkYMbJew6T03upAepKgTKggASV4s+BwsOWoOG hm720yy0x/J1Q== Message-ID: <2d88acbe-88e9-4ab1-a856-3cb63060f18f@gotplt.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:21:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Meeting Minutes - Office Hours for CTI - 2026-09-18 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Andrea Pinski , Joseph Myers Cc: Carlos O'Donell , gcc developers , glibc developers , gdb developers , binutils developers References: <0c071aeb-14f4-cd62-8fab-f3eb2659f77b@redhat.com> <043b5970-6211-41cc-a6bd-2cbf017e5b64@gotplt.org> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <043b5970-6211-41cc-a6bd-2cbf017e5b64@gotplt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2026-09-24 11:15, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> Maybe glibc-testresults should not be a mailing list but rather a >> better way of collecting test results and displaying them? > There's bunsen, but again, that's not an either-or question.  We can > always shut down the mailing list if we decide that it's not in use > anymore.  I don't think anybody has actually looked at that lately. Of course, I was wrong (as Joseph pointed out elsewhere) and all of the mailing lists were put on the table for review here: https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/932cc126-4a9a-4507-9c26-2c13524100d0@redhat.com/ Sid