From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2292 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 20:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2284 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 20:00:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.apple.com) (17.254.0.52) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 20:00:14 -0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (A17-129-100-225.apple.com [17.129.100.225]) by mail-out1.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h0MK0Dw24729 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:00:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from scv2.apple.com (scv2.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:00:10 -0800 Received: from apple.com (inghji.apple.com [17.201.22.240]) by scv2.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h0MK0AQ00498; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:00:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:00:00 -0000 Subject: Re: gdb Digest 22 Jan 2003 10:11:55 -0000 Issue 1070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com To: Andrew Cagney From: Jim Ingham In-Reply-To: <3E2EF2FF.2010201@redhat.com> Message-Id: <2CEAB148-2E44-11D7-B17A-00039379E320@apple.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 Andrew, Done. I suggested: -interpreter-complete console all? string which returns completion="longest match" if all? is NO, and completions={"first match", "second match", ...} if all? is YES. This would do both single & double . Maybe num_completions for all? == YES might be helpful as well? Jim On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 11:37 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> Andrew, >> On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 02:11 AM, >> gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote: >> Personally, I'd like to see Emacs switch from annotation level 1 to >> MI, too; then we could get rid of annotation altogether. But I think >> it makes sense to tackle level 2 first, since I don't think it has >> many users (if any). >> Yes. RMS has previously inidicated his liking of the idea of having >> EMACS use MI. The lack of a console was identified as a technical >> barrier to that change :-/ >> Andrew >> You of course knew this, but if/when Keith's interpreter's patches >> make it in, this will be close to solved. One remaining bit is that >> we need an mi "-interpreter-complete string" command that hands the >> "string" argument to the cli command line completer and returns the >> result(s) of the completion. That is necessary to implement tab >> behavior. That is on my list of things to add, though it is lower >> than some others that I have to deliver, so I am not sure when I will >> get to it. >> Other than that, the PB console works fairly well... > > Good point, can you bug report the need for this so it can be tracked. > > Andrew > > > -- Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com Developer Tools Apple Computer