From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 349 invoked by alias); 15 May 2004 08:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 342 invoked from network); 15 May 2004 08:36:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 May 2004 08:36:59 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.144.211]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id CWO90404; Sat, 15 May 2004 11:36:51 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 08:37:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andreas Schwab Message-Id: <2914-Sat15May2004113549+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: manjo@austin.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri, 14 May 2004 21:27:18 +0200) Subject: Re: List command question Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:27:18 +0200 > > You can't expect meaningful results without debugging information as > nothing else is providing information about source files. I tried this with GDB 6.1 and the DJGPP toolchain, and GDB said "(no debugging symbols found)", which is reasonable, IMHO. Why didn't it do so in Manoj's case?