From: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: gdb -- symbols read in? or not read in?
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28470.1418061861@usendtaylorx2l> (raw)
We have recently switched from STABS to DWARF for our product. And are
having some issues with DWARF that we never had with STABS.
The first was that with DWARF, GDB seems to not know about the existence
of most of the header files.
Someone would want to look at something in a header file and would say
something like "list foo.h". GDB would respond that it didn't know
anything about the header. If you did "info sources", all the *.c and
assembly files would be listed, but only a small fraction of the header
files.
I've mostly taught them to first do a list of a function in a file (or
even just the first few lines of the file) that includes the header
before trying to do something with the header.
I've gotten push back -- people wanting us to switch back to STABS --
but I've been able to resist it so far.
But, now I've encountered a new problem with DWARF. I tried
print <variable>.<member>
where <variable> is an instance of a struct and <member> is a element of
that struct.
I tried
ptype <struct name>
and
ptype <variable name>
and in both cases GDB responded with
type = struct {
<no data fields>
}
I tried listing a function within the file that defines the global
veriable and then trying again. No improvement.
Then I did "info sources" and was rather surprised at the output. There
were 3379 files mentioned.
There were 680 files in the "Source files for which symbols
have been read in:" list.
And 2699 files in the "Source files for which symbols will be read in on
demand:" list.
All files listed were shown with full paths. But, the surprising part
was that 598 of the files listed in the first list were also listed in
the second list!
So, were the symbols read in? Or not read in? No file should be in
both lists.
Is this a known problem? I didn't see anything in the bug database
about it.
Anyone know of any workarounds other than possibly adding -readnow to
the GDB startup command line which is unacceptable as it adds MINUTES to
the startup time (and haven't tried it so I don't know if it helps or
not).
If variable.member does not consistently work, I might not be able to
resist the push back to switch back to STABS.
This is with GDB 7.8 on an x86-64 GNU/Linux system.
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 18:04 David Taylor [this message]
2014-12-08 19:03 ` Doug Evans
2014-12-08 19:38 ` Doug Evans
2014-12-08 19:47 ` David Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28470.1418061861@usendtaylorx2l \
--to=dtaylor@emc.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox