From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id IzZfIsY1MGqJmAgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:26:30 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gotplt.org header.i=@gotplt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dreamhost header.b=eZ7X9F2K; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7931E1E070; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:26:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BDA1E070 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:26:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBF14AA3945 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:26:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4DBF14AA3945 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gotplt.org header.i=@gotplt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dreamhost header.b=eZ7X9F2K Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.16]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4074C900D9; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:25:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6A4074C900D9 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gotplt.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gotplt.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 6A4074C900D9 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=23.83.212.16 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1781544353; cv=none; b=Rhn4/oYzMOumojWwfc/aQQJJ7M/3dhLDxQ8E8mkDMn+gC5G1AMbQFCbH1fEjtQNegY0vbbGAXrOj+Ozjhm2VeMHjboeT72usvYr8DaLAHv7joonDmHUrfX1uJK/eO3gfhn7S5rkiscAocdBSWwxJQoLf1BxiaLEmrrl0zv9rfUE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1781544353; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+/cpKZT+hj263c9GNkvooUw1GGJu5W157ira/iqbQAw=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=v8/8zyPmfCHmpBi044JB63cGmXz99FqmAUjcqVVpn69OGABCARN76Su1KojW6XWie+xgeDUvUbZp4PImL6FBhA5+ybpxTSdSG/IQXJyBB7K2ZuL8ayJkQMKsUKSB+CWkxe3+GLPYgXAa5xrtnWo6EH4gyIUq1GCgymc0Ndc5p78= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gotplt.org header.i=@gotplt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dreamhost header.b=eZ7X9F2K DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A4074C900D9 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181AC461D53; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a258.dreamhost.com (trex-green-2.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.5.137]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ACD4D462BCB; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:25:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Eyes-Army: 3da1465562370e2c_1781544351959_4092743045 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1781544351959:1295823942 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1781544351959 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a258.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.96.5.137 (trex/7.1.5); Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:25:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.247] (unknown [38.23.181.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: siddhesh@gotplt.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a258.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gfH8G4x58z105H; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gotplt.org; s=dreamhost; t=1781544351; bh=Vr1mv7pOe6S1De6P1O/6Ng1dUSQ+81U/BGSXXhlXBnM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eZ7X9F2K1JhTHLZCuQ/R0VSgRy/TAhsD9M4uPG+zZcwYpVW9H3qZgxANj3r6STHWw RBuJ3bNWm7m78TEHN9N2AFJ9HIRXARpBplenDRlsMFEV+54UDbLd+oUXWQ9tgCesXh Du+Fendss+19RtWZ8CmaWDGmfHV6XllVFELxHEASqOO0x7FJBFGAfL8a/OSCqCuQYH jUThmIZKkBzrhNqBGsgr23FhDtOyCGmNe91xaqZ1zSfVhOV7aePDUGblQYB49/kL9f XmzAg9V0aNkZq8p+JYwFon8aUkwyO4aE6GSPsMAiVRyOtp2FvFA+B81xGKIdw5jYbA yCrmkqXowi3jw== Message-ID: <25ebff11-fa7d-4b58-94ec-37e0a01de9eb@gotplt.org> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:25:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Nominations_for_Anthropic=E2=80=99s_Claude_for_Open?= =?UTF-8?Q?_Source_program?= To: Andrew Pinski , Adhemerval Zanella Netto Cc: Carlos O'Donell , glibc developers , gdb developers References: <5c2e18dd-807c-4331-b12c-a5b17b256f5b@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Siddhesh Poyarekar In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 12/06/2026 19:11, Andrew Pinski wrote: > All of this talk about llm and llm reviews is off-topic for this list. Including the original email is off-topic and should not have been sent. How so? Adhemerval's comment mentioned LLM use for patch reviews in other GNU projects, which is useful information for this developer community. >   Can you step down from the llm gcc working group for this email since > it shows a conflict of interest of prompting one product.  Plus it shows > poor taste of sending out an email about a non free product to a mailing > list about glibc development. Visible maintainers of FOSS projects routinely get these kinds of offers upfront and forwarding them to community members IMO doesn't mean anything more than simply making others aware. I don't see a conflict of interest here, but that's for the WG to decide. Is this marketing for Anthropic? Yes, and it is the right of the members of this community to reject it outright, or use it to experiment if they wish to, without contributing AI generated legally significant code to the project. FWIW, I have a strong personal preference against using frontier LLMs. Maybe I'm more acceptable as a LLM WG member because I align with your position? ;) Sid