From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id P7RsBzQ2A2pNnzMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 10:16:20 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Fklq1ADz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 07FA41E0BA; Tue, 12 May 2026 10:16:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2F51E067 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 10:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCE44BAE7CF for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 14:16:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DFCE44BAE7CF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1778595377; bh=q0gv26MqYS3CORKljU+1qRHtDY37WwYPoY/YzZNLspU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=Fklq1ADzvpbXonjS9SQBKrsxKUlxFWIL7bMDpsb27EkuDHIbu6kdB/MqXKBvpB8uw vh6EApVp4VI6x3Bog4gJHGV2sGi3JNW/wsJXygzltXgOsmNOscYGRMEJVn4l4fcjQy zBQMivThsVhJOiCxKdLEO1EGTi16uvYjE6tJqvT8= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483264BABF32 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 14:15:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 483264BABF32 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 483264BABF32 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1778595335; cv=none; b=cJrBI8B+AAOXU+3DOvmrLrKT0zHcqIFcT5OXPUa+Sjs6Eqsj/wCxrsSLdD+10j280AYazvdli0GRfe0DvybKRhg77GFNe8Mlss2r17QXC1WIqtyq9pQWB+zppoK9UfKxYLCRB4e6ZH8ye050N8niX91M8GTpxE2aWKLzN7vqAfc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1778595335; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DrSq3qK8+I6rQbyzZ5K/gUCC2YF2TolPuuYzkVrPqzk=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=SQIhY0kY1ao+/os3JGsmlu9oSWFAHcyxu7edUmtRME4m4kMH19YshDgKdGF2JM5S2YTFcJ6erUwmiR6fKNEZCrsDvabq0VpRRuaHjE6Cm0cjFhEryytFpJiQDWXJQ5Z1quqXQNI6asz2G9s2/VnIUibDMd6RrG/uHhvTdiW+kPw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=lNYGfcJ1 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 483264BABF32 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix) id 66BC91E067; Tue, 12 May 2026 10:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <25ae9885-e197-437f-9f98-9b87ff093834@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 10:15:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Fixing commit dates before pushing To: Tom de Vries , "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <6789f4cc-cc39-4061-8079-195d5ef5a362@suse.de> Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: <6789f4cc-cc39-4061-8079-195d5ef5a362@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 5/12/26 4:19 AM, Tom de Vries via Gdb wrote: > Hi, > > back in 2014, a requirement was added to the contribution checklist: fixing commit dates ( https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist#Fixing_commit_dates ). > > The related discussion is here ( https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb/20140814083231.GA6283@blade.nx/T/#u ). > > Looking at recent commits, this is done by a few people, but not everybody. > > [ FWIW, I'm using a push script (see below) that takes care of this for me. ] > > If not too many people actually do this, and nobody's complaining about it, should we drop the requirement? I must admit that I have never done this myself, so I am not very attached to this rule. Simon