From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7372 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 19:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7364 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 19:58:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mirapoint.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 19:58:41 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by mirapoint.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2) with ESMTP id ABQ30159; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:24:21 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:58:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: dberlin@dberlin.org Message-Id: <2593-Tue23Apr2002222418+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: ssmoser@us.ibm.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Daniel Berlin on Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:28:00 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: GDB plugin proposal Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:28:00 -0400 (EDT) > From: Daniel Berlin > > RMS's viewpoint isn't legally relevant. He may be right. He may be wrong. > He claims he's right, but that doesn't make it so. > He'd *like* to be right, but that also doesn't make it so. > Certainly, anything related to law that RMS spouts should be taken with a > *large* grain of salt. I think this is terribly unfair, and shouldn't have been sent except perhaps in private email. If you are going to ruin someone's reputation in public, at least CC him so he would be able to defend himself.