From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: amodra@bigpond.net.au, gdb@sources.redhat.com, aoliva@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com
Subject: Re: po/POTFILES.in doesn't exist
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 10:05:00 -0000
Message-id: <2593-Tue02Oct2001190537+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010729143812.3073B-100000@is> <3B707412.9080906@cygnus.com> <20010807161144.A28818@nevyn.them.org> <3BB2AC9A.1080306@cygnus.com> <20011002232138.L1019@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3BB9E5AF.2050207@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00027.html

> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 12:05:03 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> 
> Assuming it makes it into the trunk, does anyone have an opinion on 
> committing it to the 5.1 branch?  On the up-side is that it eliminates 
> the configure warning, on the down side, the warning didn't appear to do 
> any harm any way.

I generally think that something is very wrong when the configure
script prints error messages.