From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7989 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 19:58:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7982 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 19:58:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO diana.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.19) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 19:58:24 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.194.191]) by diana.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id AQH01028; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:58:04 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:58:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ezannoni@redhat.com Message-Id: <2561-Thu14Nov2002215828+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: ac131313@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <15826.46569.868549.694289@localhost.redhat.com> (message from Elena Zannoni on Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:28:25 -0500) Subject: Re: Behavior of 'until' command Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <15826.42439.877628.972525@localhost.redhat.com> <20021113193458.GA31982@nevyn.them.org> <3DD2AB2B.5020304@redhat.com> <15826.46569.868549.694289@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 > From: Elena Zannoni > Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:28:25 -0500 > > So all agree that > > "until fun2" == "break fun2; continue" ?? Yes, I agree.