From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25792 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2009 23:04:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 25784 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2009 23:04:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from kuber.nabble.com (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:04:14 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MD4vs-0004Px-Nw for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: <23906434.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:04:00 -0000 From: nitinvk04 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb exits with segmentation fault In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0906060755g456d4502yc0242a4c2ff926ca@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <23901800.post@talk.nabble.com> <8ac60eac0906060755g456d4502yc0242a4c2ff926ca@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 hello Paul I somehow missed this - i could have tried installing gdb 6.8 on mandrake 10 first. I thought as it's old linux kernel, it might require older gdb. I could install 6.8 and it's working fine till now. BTW - im working on old linux dist. as I am a grad. student working on running some exploits on vulnerabilities available on that and intrusion detection. Thanks a lot for the help. Nitin Paul Pluzhnikov-4 wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:16 AM, nitinvk04 wrote: > >> I am using Mandrake 10 with a kernel 2.6.3-7mdk. and the gdb >> is 6.0 - quite old, but i have some requirement. > > It is quite unlikely that anyone will look at why GDB 6.0 crashes for > you, and you haven't explained why you need such an old GDB ("I have > some requirement" doesn't explain anything to me). > > Why don't you compile GDB from current CVS Head instead? > > Cheers, > -- > Paul Pluzhnikov > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/gdb-exits-with-segmentation-fault-tp23901800p23906434.html Sent from the Sourceware - gdb list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.