From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id UHMFMsodOmhuDDsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:06:18 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=qjSK8/Dr; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C7ECD1E102; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:06:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B121E0C2 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:06:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B110C385703C for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 21:06:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B110C385703C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1748639177; bh=LiB7CGu66+mnnlKZsnFIm/o0N+zrsYD9hZ9oujfOvyo=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=qjSK8/DrTgkmfmEA3sZqHL9BxDpoFAJ7qp07CfaTF76rg5EZFPiwbeYFB4Rp6K8et 779Cr9HlszeJ13O7vkAx8k2R/8tELhenuW7zFYMihoGRBKCgHYEZ4yoGvI9jT0tXQ9 dI8LSGDfLArZ/Rt0yHRwDkCjJ7QeJIqUuUxpBc0A= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7E93858D20 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 21:05:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0F7E93858D20 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0F7E93858D20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1748639123; cv=none; b=IwWO1LwUiZyW2uPPHcVxmzdHhLMjrj+hY6r5l1FtS9uBtUA5eIQgTulX8sI5+fgK8+gB1oqLc8nFix4Z6nOYSfSDxDHJ5BHo1Yj/2zsZ59QjUA2TGiEKYY/+W6iae4TSz5VrcT6jvMxj5tvbxi/YancpphYqs6QrGAMcg0XwUWk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1748639123; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qkx4ADqyw+38KT33gH7m4VH4GVS7cDarL4qGe+fBCS4=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=sLbe0QUwYkGHEUty1Z/YJ8UTNWeEfx07KtdfD0CK6VLcKuXHCJUzsnGq4eCMC3LloFd4X6W5gij8jS5bNsbsLi0SV2j5S8PkTU6PW80OKR1bcObd3P7MUBn47JbQ2ZlTqCGcWYG99c1oRW3LW9Y2dNJnnqOMs7cT91jSKYdjbB4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F7E93858D20 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 54UL5HZ7237604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:05:22 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 54UL5HZ7237604 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D4E4B1E11E; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:05:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.0.11] (modemcable238.237-201-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.201.237.238]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EF581E0C2; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:05:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2383362c-c833-41d2-bb85-6a59fe668c84@polymtl.ca> Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 17:05:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Do we still support DICOS? To: Luis Machado , =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3_Benedek?= , "gdb@sourceware.org" References: Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 30 May 2025 21:05:17 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2020-12-11 09:25, Luis Machado wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/11/20 6:34 AM, László Benedek wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am an Ericsson engineer working on a product that is the next version in the evolution of Dicos. This GDB support is still actively used in our products in Ericsson. >> If it is possible please do not remove it from GDB. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Laszlo Benedek >> Ericsson >> >> p.s.: I am not a subscriber on the gdb mail list, I was notified about this discussion. If you'd like to answer please cc me directly. > > Thanks for the update. > > It would be nice to have someone step up and be a maintainer of the "port" then, otherwise I think this question will be raised again in a couple years. > > If we have a name we can get in touch with, it makes it easier for us to verify the status of the code and prevent unwanted removals. Hi László, I stumbled on Dicos today, as I was working on a feature, so I thought I'd do a check-in with you. Can you confirm that the Dicos port is still used? Also, do you guys really use upstream GDB for this, not an ancient version? Given that there was no updates regarding Dicos in many many years, I would actually be a bit surprised if the port hadn't bit-rotten a little bit. Thanks! Simon