From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34500-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8908 invoked by alias); 28 May 2009 22:36:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 8818 invoked by uid 22791); 28 May 2009 22:36:18 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from kuber.nabble.com (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 May 2009 22:36:13 +0000
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) 	by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) 	(envelope-from <lists@nabble.com>) 	id 1M9oCp-0005dP-LB 	for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 15:36:11 -0700
Message-ID: <23771374.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:36:00 -0000
From: Peter Nordstrom <pxno_64@yahoo.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: ARM VFP support
In-Reply-To: <23770517.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <be62573b0904011325t5a6ebad9p46cfc8e0c92503f8@mail.gmail.com> <20090401203824.GA23715@caradoc.them.org> <23626267.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090519233059.GA2322@caradoc.them.org> <23626852.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090520131701.GA2980@caradoc.them.org> <23770517.post@talk.nabble.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2


Playing around with the target description files make the assertion go away,
but not able to read anything useful.


Peter Nordstrom wrote:
> 
> Yes, target is needed. I'm running on a Marvell Feroceon. 
> 
> The problem seems to be that mach gets set to bfd_mach_arm_unknown instead
> of bfd_mach_arm_5TE.
> 
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz-2 wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 05:31:48PM -0700, Peter Nordstrom wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm still getting:
>>> 
>>> /scratch/maxim/arm-lite/obj-4.3-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-lite/gdb-src-2009q1-176-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-mingw32/gdb/regcache.c:178:
>>> internal-error: register_size: Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum <
>>> (gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch) + gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs (gdbarch))'
>>> failed.
>>> 
>>> any ideas?
>> 
>> Do you need a target to reproduce this bug?  If not, can you send me
>> the binary?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Daniel Jacobowitz
>> CodeSourcery
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ARM-VFP-support-tp22835058p23771374.html
Sent from the Sourceware - gdb list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.