From: "Ravi Ramaseshan" <ramaseshan.ravi@gmail.com>
To: "Jude Moersdorf" <Jude.Moersdorf@pt.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB STL Memory Usage Issue
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22080b0a0704101329n55abfa0ev51f97937d120634c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0F6E41788631664DBE8DF13D06298FE1948A@sloexchange01.corp.pt.com>
On 4/10/07, Jude Moersdorf <Jude.Moersdorf@pt.com> wrote:
> Is your application multi-threaded? If so, are many threads created and
> destroyed? Check that you don't have a bunch of zombie child threads
> that need to be reaped.
>
No, my application is single threaded.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On
> Behalf Of Ravi Ramaseshan
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 7:36 AM
> To: Mark Kettenis
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: GDB STL Memory Usage Issue
>
> On 4/10/07, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:40:58 -0400
> > > From: "Ravi Ramaseshan" <ramaseshan.ravi@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I observed some strange behavior with the following system that I
> > > would like to know more about:
> > >
> > > I'm compiling a very memory intensive C++ application that uses STL
> > > (hashmaps of lists). Every few seconds I erase() the entire hashmap
> > > (and the lists). When I run the program standalone and examine the
> > > memory usage using top, I see the total virtual memory of the
> program
> > > grow (sometimes to 60+MB) before the erase call and after the erase
> > > call drop down to a few MB - which is the behavior I would expect.
> > >
> > > However, when I run the same program through GDB, the erase() does
> not
> > > seem to have any effect and the virtual memory usage keeps on rising
> -
> > > which I do not understand.
> > >
> > > I am using GCC 4.0.3, GDB 6.4 and am compiling the program with
> > > debugging information. I would like to understand the reasons for
> such
> > > a behavior of my program under GDB.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Smells like an operating system bug to me.
> >
> >
>
> I am running an Ubuntu system 2.6.15-28-686 kernel, if that helps
> anyone explain the problem I observed.
>
> --
> Ravi Ramaseshan
> http://www.geocities.com/ramaseshan_ravi/
>
> " Reality is only something we believe in strongly. "
>
--
Ravi Ramaseshan
http://www.geocities.com/ramaseshan_ravi/
" Reality is only something we believe in strongly. "
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-10 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-10 18:59 Jude Moersdorf
2007-04-10 20:29 ` Ravi Ramaseshan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-09 23:41 Ravi Ramaseshan
2007-04-10 8:16 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-04-10 14:36 ` Ravi Ramaseshan
2007-04-11 8:21 ` Álvaro Vega García
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22080b0a0704101329n55abfa0ev51f97937d120634c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ramaseshan.ravi@gmail.com \
--cc=Jude.Moersdorf@pt.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox