From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@cygnus.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: PA64 configure issues 
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:26:00 -0000
Message-id: <21743.956863061@upchuck>
References: <orpurb8k6p.fsf@zecarneiro.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
X-SW-Source: 2000-04/msg00151.html

  In message < orpurb8k6p.fsf@zecarneiro.lsd.ic.unicamp.br >you write:
  > On Apr 27, 2000, Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> wrote:
  > 
  > > I'm not worried about the ones with hppa* -- I've already identified thos
  > e;
  > > it's those which do stuff like hppa?.? that I worry about.
  > 
  > Well, those are already broken, since this doesn't match hppa-*-hpux*.
  > And they don't match the trailing `w' either, so it's ok if they don't
  > match an additional trailing `64'.  I wouldn't worry about them.
hppa without a version number is not valid in a configuration string.  The
fact that gcc and maybe other accept it is lame and broken.

jeff