From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21901-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14287 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 11:44:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14267 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2005 11:44:16 -0000
Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net (HELO 25.mail-out.ovh.net) (213.186.37.103)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:44:16 +0000
Received: (qmail 18941 invoked by uid 503); 17 Jun 2005 11:36:55 -0000
Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail133.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56)
  by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 17 Jun 2005 11:36:55 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50)
	by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 17 Jun 2005 11:37:03 -0000
Received: from 193.48.246.16 (proxying for 10.20.0.236)
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user 
     victor.stinner-linux@haypocalc.com);
        by squirrel.ovh.net with HTTP;
        Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:37:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <21719.193.48.246.16.1119008223.squirrel@193.48.246.16>
In-Reply-To: <uslzh1cvu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1118892960.12713.5.camel@haypopc> <u4qby2jmi.fsf@gnu.org>
    <20050616182936.GA4062@nevyn.them.org> <uwtou13fo.fsf@gnu.org>
    <20050616190315.GA5572@nevyn.them.org> <uslzh1cvu.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:44:00 -0000
Subject: Re: Display libc function names instead of address ?
From: "Victor STINNER" <victor.stinner-linux@haypocalc.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: victor.stinner-linux@haypocalc.com
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2

> Ah, the lights go on: so this problem only happens with dynamically
> linked programs?  If so, that is what I was missing.  Thanks for
> explaining it.

Yes, I was speaking about dynamically linked programs. That's why I was
speaking about "objdump -R", dynamical relocation.

Bye, Haypo
PS: I subscribed to GDB mailing-list since my first post.