From: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
To: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: possible 'info macro' extension
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20506.1406558858@usendtaylorx2l> (raw)
To expand a macro in a particular context, our GUI used to do something
like:
list <line spec>,<line spec>
or
list *0xaddress
or something similar. And for years that worked fine. Then we upgraded
GDB and it stopped working. Investigating I discovered that the chantge
was deliberate.
Would enhancing 'info macro' from
info macro <MACRO-NAME>
to
info macro [-at <LOCATION>] <MACRO-NAME>
be looked upon favorably?
reply other threads:[~2014-07-28 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20506.1406558858@usendtaylorx2l \
--to=dtaylor@emc.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox