From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id scAwMnwn7mjLLDEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:35:40 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B96911E0B6; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:35:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2F71E04C for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:35:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7D43858C52 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:35:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED7D43858C52 Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93EB83858C52 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:34:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 93EB83858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 93EB83858C52 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=45.83.234.184 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1760438090; cv=none; b=Guqe5XiYFG1PVbw6HMyPu7klfjGHAMDufdwjiF0YiCk1X5J05l2EJ2muBx+oYmfgHH/bBQJEzV0hJrjUig03bH+4j51TB0f2rWrY7krLLoKxky9vVx++FVnD6ZXsi26GHpA8ZepzLVGWnBCaWuPGNYi9R/ThDMKjMtU6D8nf7G8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1760438090; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HRTyB4GaywqvHXnJ+Ti9OyfV/oJeiSfRc6nc9gQMbxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=QdrJELDoZOLpSVEWP/2hgvsF1B/UnMbnv98/hTARqu2+2DlMfxCwsVH7ND7kh4UY0ZuyJ4qCVlqHQnRb4lkUDhILeikAG2eqqgLU1bBqgulcdVh5cwLpCvzATPi1dpsagnwtdTEKWI8hjC87QBuZfszUkA9QFrz+jSWEBjb/zl4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93EB83858C52 Received: by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B705B314138B; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:34:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:34:49 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Bo YU Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, sergiodj@redhat.com Subject: Re: Could we add RISC-V =?utf-8?Q?64-bit_?= =?utf-8?Q?=28riscv64=29_buildslave_to_GDB_BuildBot=EF=BC=9F?= Message-ID: <20251014103449.GL30855@gnu.wildebeest.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi Bo, On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 09:24:59AM +0800, Bo YU via Gdb wrote: > When I was looking at some GDB patches, I was surprised to find that > the GDB buildbot[0] did not support riscv64. Do you know if we have a > plan to add this? We don't have a riscv buildbot for gdb, but not one that sents results to the gdb-testers mailinglist. The results are in bunsen though: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/gdb-riscv-full https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/gdb-ubuntu-riscv https://builder.sourceware.org/testruns/?has_keyvalue_op=glob&has_keyvalue_k=testrun.gitdescribe&has_keyvalue_v=buildbot/gdb%2Ariscv%2A > I would be very interested in contributing a riscv64 buildslave to the > project with help of plctlab[1]. I have read the project wiki[2] and > understand that as the contributor, I would be responsible for > maintaining the builder and investigating its issues. I am afraid the wiki page is really out of date. It probably should just point to https://builder.sourceware.org/ More builders would certainly be appreciated. See https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/README_workers for how to add one. > [0]: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-testers/ > [1]: https://github.com/plctlab/riscv-lab-access > [2]: https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/BuildBot Thanks, Mark