From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id kOceKDw9fmeZ+QYAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 03:54:20 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=hZzWtC+e; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A1CD11E0C0; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 03:54:20 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3791E091 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 03:54:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A813858C33 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:54:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1A813858C33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1736326459; bh=M/r3B5qDbHm7smbAOp3Fw4vGSQYX0vnM5cLZxVPmyiQ=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=hZzWtC+e5k8lb2Jcw5NgotRjW51WrmbYV1ee0afJddAdaCweTFcuaOEQJI6BI0td2 iaIfFsarCp4voXMEFioQqfv0YR7Zm3+f6mPS8DpeY2Rron6+ev0UlFPxXXrm7g8T8X JL9vEdeEfA7HIZJeCWqrSKLn7YHjNfyZUv03WOwU= Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 135323858D21 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:52:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 135323858D21 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 135323858D21 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1736326334; cv=none; b=KydoLr8jvCvg14/sOV4NCDBzBckjGWJRbtGGJCXh5ifXuN6NTbfZC7CMjYMK3ddkeV5N6v7XCrVdSCNmpHlGXyxvQyO7tH4gAVGd6NqaJkc9tjXuKTp7eKRdYu/gmALuRADo11yZ32GvaWsRyX2Qvcx9ug6n+Zupx/D+/Kb7QkM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1736326334; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JUeW35ia7F4zq1nd6rkCKdCcSCcA9AcxjfumNNRi4ZA=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=WjMgWjZ7XuBT5LM1ORw7fKfR013uizRPRRe2DewVUmaBeVAaHcEwdMAqTgt5nvCMaLetrX3LWnOzAjE4dXArxNYbl4QlKIrzAH1TvBCLZleiJmE/dLK2ote2aQ/HAMIFGYoXeNSLEZWZ2+595xWY7aeoY6doTffE4pxEY3Hbi0E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 135323858D21 X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from vepi2 ([80.141.189.170]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M7sDg-1tQTz11SJG-00Dd3M; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 09:51:53 +0100 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:51:52 +0100 To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Eric Botcazou , Jason Merrill , Richard Biener , Mark Wielaard , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova , gdb@sourceware.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dwarf2out: Emit DWARF 6 DW_AT_language_{name,version} Message-ID: <20250108095152.34398296@vepi2> In-Reply-To: References: <2160636.9o76ZdvQCi@fomalhaut> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:sl7Y3gZVVay1jFl8TdVstAaEz044Fywf+6FwYJIjcxBewlhrw+h lAQZq3LHNo2tF1Vp26pNSyDwkqKHDun+VqamzrpcMygdxZ05m/66z4QWs3tT9ifU6O4JG6J 6tBBMZ6atMQn0NT1tEWenfF0uFoFkG1i7YeCCoHNwhMof/nLVLT6iZ9w8M310pF5zqO3wlw SQy5/adZ+7xt8gf+sTTXg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:/3aMhtnq534=;0KxvScLEHq3XP6IgGpqn5R1gxrz ijesACmuYUUKSfRQQmDljai1eyTk6wBg8faNkx15ShUOyv+Z4/6PVMPK7TCld6BhVCOQemfrD XJQMzAZez1brwUnY0nROwFr/TQy81lpBbnQ1h4XerSL1bbLazdX8ghpes3VGKgLYm6cVP1oo1 KCYaON1YP84dio1nyowf5RkyrdXVU8m1vn6Gda+z4L96SW3F+v7IiOtOVMC2on1aMa9siszUz Er7KH8y/+8LF7/3GmIxPjG8VM/yPkaiocDQTcpdCPviSSMHFM3qSctJFbJEYrDZ0Ws1IyWwVO AHzBc6TsBn0/89Daex+tjvTqo41eq4rdehul5iMUqKi63KBUNCsGqXLT90+mFiB8oeVkwctoD JSIxX++8Pg3Mf0mhdA+aeyXaeKQMwMVhzI43E59a7fmTfmHGhWzmS5LmpU4T4m07oBc++s9XC //4+frHeuPn/aWmKsrHxjf66arhO5LzAv9VHIz7Bcd7RnwQJFm8RKXqW6FAw9vOJtZV8F5GXl GQRyHRt5+868OeS61q3MIQS2PGxgSbplG6aHcJvkNZkY3A9i1FQgYAsg9FIK5OxNas2ULgq1c T7c5h+8oBgwWxWnUBSaVSsM2KkKaFK+YkyL6HJYGOxK8/ttf8oBetkg/eDdDwExHqadKch3um yHm59rKRqiKWQpT7JUqWpnksrtDd2SpGV4hvjak+QhsUdGM1NK4ek3WmKBn9NMHB8OI8i8W87 Nv1yH7Jm7J0g3uTnCcCM9D1OQPSXmyZyiHKsyinHbcPw5BhfwXhAIcIihjasIyka0HWOJmhQ/ K/XeH2IC0Xhsfdn+tX5ZfqVy/xv6+cKXsItL4tvXqfdXnXg3TpsJ0kj/r5vc+gFYF3Hg6qSm2 sKkn+hgV3l8Ln1Lnvcl4L65o3NRy5l2StM8jkR8M/O/SkPgnVLlDyRg3nvMadrAArH8MRfCgf n/7LOJ7IpctlCfGxzbwm9m/BzYClYG01rN5DdwSoH2SxXk6Qw0o+DgycPsiHfcy93+n1dLW6x A60jw4c7+8FXOMF3PORT16cbzqu1kMPYCJlrQ5mbBp2L0HCnhWeqNWowPnqykBlrL3J39GHeC XJ1fAFMah/9+T+UthFVmYP3aekdwqB X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andre Vehreschild via Gdb Reply-To: Andre Vehreschild Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" May be add a feature request PR for this for Ada and Fortran to prevent us from forgetting to evaluate the necessity or ability to provide that flag/information? Sorry for me using a wrong term or expression above. I have not yet any knowledge or gotten in touch with DWARF stuff. - Andre On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:37:34 +0100 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > > So, this patch is an alternative to the > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669671.html > > > patch, which had the major problem that it required changing all the > > > DWARF consumers to be able to debug C17 or later or C++17 or later > > > sources. > > > > Do you plan to salvage the non-obsoleted parts of the above change? > > No. The switches on DW_AT_language value are a GCC internal thing, > if we never generate say the post-DWARF5 DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_23, > we don't need to handle it in the switch. > > Though, Ada and Fortran could have a similar change to the C/C++ > one, i.e. also add DW_AT_language_{name,version} for newer Ada and Fortr= an > versions, say DW_LNAME_Ada and then dunno whether 2005, 2012 and 2022 > or 2007, 2012 and 2023, in https://dwarfstd.org/languages-v6.html > the versioning scheme for Ada (as well as Fortran) is YYYY. > Similarly DW_LNAME_Fortran 2018 and 2023. > > The reason I haven't done it myself is that the Ada FE doesn't tell > Ada version at all - there is just "GNU Ada" and dwarf2out.cc right now > implies it is Ada 95 for DWARF3 and Ada 83 otherwise. > And in the Fortran case, while the FE provides a version, it only > does so for Fortran 2003 and 2008 (and just "GNU Fortran" implies Fortra= n 90 > in dwarf2out). So, no marking of Fortran 2018 or Fortran 2023. > > Jakub > =2D- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de