From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id GKe7JQnz02Pk4yIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:51:37 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 960151E128; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:51:37 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=YyZwGCem; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1033C1E110 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:51:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC80385B50A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:51:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4BC80385B50A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1674834696; bh=CDC2Y4byDjadP1rvEbGr1ycZ+q71/jyIPSBAOMQKEFU=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=YyZwGCemisnxO8xODLGaEiv5UDe0O/JDHaLBQuQj1h4CDJ+cnAfF0/FUstwzHsMs9 2Ibd3MSfIzGFGozDw1K7WMtKNlPZbu6U3ha9EZl43kdjXRrXyzMwYcUSUuz6Ggi/kp 7JqAokIJRxudOOkmpy4K6wlFO1KD4SOu1fSqeumQ= Received: from lndn.lancelotsix.com (vps-42846194.vps.ovh.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:801:2000::2400]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168553858C00 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:51:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 168553858C00 Received: from ubuntu.lan (cust120-dsl54.idnet.net [212.69.54.120]) by lndn.lancelotsix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7836480E9E; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:50:16 +0000 To: Tom Tromey Cc: Mark Wielaard , Luis Machado , Simon Marchi , "gdb@sourceware.org" , John Baldwin Subject: Re: Any concrete plans after the GDB BoF? Message-ID: <20230127155016.zchm4tsawlkdfyne@ubuntu.lan> References: <83485199-965e-7ff5-1dc8-d027b74b56f7@arm.com> <20230101220250.GA11041@gnu.wildebeest.org> <87tu0lxgee.fsf@tromey.com> <87bkmtx83b.fsf@tromey.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bkmtx83b.fsf@tromey.com> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (lndn.lancelotsix.com [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Lancelot SIX via Gdb Reply-To: Lancelot SIX Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:30:00PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > Mark> I use git-pw for that: > Mark> https://patchwork.readthedocs.io/projects/git-pw/ > > Tom> Just to be clear -- I think if people want to use git-pw, they should, > Tom> and shouldn't wait for some official blessing. > > I gave it a look today. There were 8 pages of patches, but nearly all > of them have been checked in. I went through and cleaned out a few > pages, but TBH this is pretty boring, not to mention error-prone. > > Tom Hi, I usually try to run a script doing this automatically. However, it can only detect when a checked-in patch exactly matches what have been sent to the ML. So the situations where we have "OK to merge with this detail fixed" will not be caught by the script. Also, I wish patchwork could automatically close a patches/series when a new revision is sent to the ML. This is another class of patches which remain on patchwork when they should probably not. I did try to close those manually in the past, but got overwhelmed, so I do not do that anymore. That being said, I still use git-pw to fetch and apply patch and series. This is really convenient when I am not working on the host where I have my mail client. Lancelot.