From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id wzNdMkSuvWORyBMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:28:20 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C205A1E128; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:28:20 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=KH6Gywxb; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBDB1E0D3 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:28:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D92385B510 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:28:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8D92385B510 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1673375299; bh=2mK6Et4VjjPdy99JWL7BhwhKAZYe+prCZPFgaHrQIOY=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=KH6Gywxb/xBD5pMqLPV8C7Z/BmSa4hIP1Xai9QqXcWq5ZRXV0tIvIrgy4vrL9Dtt6 lUbVYT39vUGNA2BmlDL6xw2pyEhRcggkFjZscyudCwI+KwrVdj9AXCjaQ1aWtZTSwR Pn2NMmamlCJ7HOvojKBvwOn0EMryd+quHGrqse9I= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6CA23858D33 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:27:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C6CA23858D33 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-219-YRI30qLpNnWozRWBc4RRLg-1; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:27:48 -0500 X-MC-Unique: YRI30qLpNnWozRWBc4RRLg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A5C181E3F3; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BF042166B29; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche by redhat.com with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pFJLT-0000k8-EL; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:27:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:27:35 -0500 To: gdb@sourceware.org Cc: Mark Wielaard , Joel Brobecker , Mike Frysinger , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Overseers mailing list , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: setting up sim project web space Message-ID: <20230110182735.GC9006@redhat.com> References: <20230105223840.GI8237@gnu.wildebeest.org> <20230105224340.GJ8237@gnu.wildebeest.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gdb" Reply-To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi - > - I currently have a cvsgit clone, which doesn't work well to keep > it in sync with other people's changes, so it would be best if > the htdocs CVS repo was converted to git first. > - Once it is in Git, I don't have a problem with Mike being given > access to it; Can we have an official thumbs up from the gdb leadership to make this transition? We should be able to do it fairly quickly, but it is a "flag day" sort of thing, requiring deprecation of the cvs copy. - FChE