From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id Q/VhCcuqVWPW1Q8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 16:57:47 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 13EA41E112; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 16:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=B+6NJKUG; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987CD1E0D3 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 16:57:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D913853825 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 20:57:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65D913853825 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1666558663; bh=uEs3GwVcIUmyBGu8fxtwSu4fXIF3drNoZDBJI1QXmZ0=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=B+6NJKUGNoKrzEPcyGrR+u0rqxxLR4/qyHwNteBVfWEJ9u8sVH/+N8R5KkqJiqoXt ZnIIlUXiLCaNTLPcNCqVnhF+4qafd6I9VAfEqdllZPzuA29wJOAV8wcU65KAnFkBMD 9Zb1loj8W8iLtjrXwsGtPUNZ9LAZJ3t5H1Cl4+1s= Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE883857342; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 20:57:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BEE883857342 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx 3474BE9432 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 16:57:09 -0400 To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Subject: Re: Toolchain Infrastructure project statement of support Message-ID: <20221023205709.lxlhwq7nrxcojjyn@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Ian Kelling , Overseers mailing list , gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> <20221013182529.sm76fysq37sv754x@cgf.cx> <9c0a9111-07b1-3617-c5c8-4b12e616f985@gotplt.org> <7abeb179-2c05-eee9-bd68-3b5f8a11bd32@gotplt.org> <87zgdmyg30.fsf@fsf.org> <230909ee-fb2c-cca0-abbe-fd7d6434efab@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <230909ee-fb2c-cca0-abbe-fd7d6434efab@gotplt.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Christopher Faylor via Gdb Reply-To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Overseers mailing list , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , binutils@sourceware.org, Ian Kelling Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 02:25:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Re: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2022q4/018981.html > >On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:43:09PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >>The GNU Toolchain project leadership supports the proposal[1] to move the >>services for the GNU Toolchain to the Linux Foundation IT under the auspices of >>the Toolchain Infrastructure project (GTI) with fiscal sponsorship from the >>OpenSSF and other major donors. > >Noted, however, a list of signatories does not automatically confer >authority over any particular project.  Any participation from >overseers in moving projects to different infrastructure will require >clear approval from the individual projects themselves. > >Also, the FSF, being the existing fiscal sponsor to these projects, >surely needs to review the formal agreements before we sunset our >infrastructural offerings to glibc, gcc, binutils, and gdb and hand >control of the projects' infrastructure over to a different entity. > >We'd like to assure the communities that, when and if any individual >project formally expresses the decision of their developers to transfer >their services, we'll endeavor to make the move as smooth as possible. >Those projects that wish to stay will continue to receive the best >services that the overseers can offer, with the ongoing assistance of >Red Hat, the SFC, and, when relevant, the FSF tech team. On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 09:27:26AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >Given that the current sourceware admins have decided to block migration of >all sourceware assets to the LF IT, I don't have a stake on how they'd like >to handle this for sourceware. I could however, as a member of TAC (and as >member of projects that have agreed to migrate to LF IT, i.e. gcc and glibc), >discuss with others the possibility of specific community volunteers being >given some amount of access to manage infrastructure. Stop spreading FUD. The "we" in my statement above, from October 13, included fche, mjw, and myself. You have no reason to be confused on this subject.