From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 6GDmIPpaVWOgwQ8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:17:14 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8363E1E112; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:17:14 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=tYQ3l4lm; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C6F1E0D3 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:17:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB0A3857C67 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:17:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8CB0A3857C67 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1666538233; bh=4+d2yOj8tD+eIPTDF5GVefzV54tC8fiinN3j5ncBUJQ=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=tYQ3l4lmz/QxFbl/el0XVKTYcHJliN4f5CpPkntMv9UP95XFIdfV7x59TK6xKpeR9 QYD/DxlZCW5aujUvQTa11G90X8W0sETWbNxzRFYMS6aE3sqq9vhJzaPe7UekF25B/J FnRL2pzWALLagOS6YKHtnvD3RRrpYcRxu7qjUuzI= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095E43858CDA for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:16:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 095E43858CDA Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-256--5Ua_NORPHS9sM14gUH1pA-1; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:16:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -5Ua_NORPHS9sM14gUH1pA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73BE8339B4; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB54940C2066; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche by redhat.com with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1omciO-00046I-Fh; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:16:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:16:40 -0400 To: Overseers mailing list Subject: Re: Toolchain Infrastructure project statement of support Message-ID: <20221023151640.GA8034@redhat.com> References: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> <20221013182529.sm76fysq37sv754x@cgf.cx> <9c0a9111-07b1-3617-c5c8-4b12e616f985@gotplt.org> <7abeb179-2c05-eee9-bd68-3b5f8a11bd32@gotplt.org> <87zgdmyg30.fsf@fsf.org> <230909ee-fb2c-cca0-abbe-fd7d6434efab@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <230909ee-fb2c-cca0-abbe-fd7d6434efab@gotplt.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gdb" Reply-To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , binutils@sourceware.org, Ian Kelling Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi - > [...] Given that the current sourceware admins have decided to > block migration of all sourceware assets to the LF IT [...] If you're trying to say that projects have not unanimously shown interest in moving infrastructure to LF IT, just say that. Don't blame overseers. If you're trying to suggest that overseers, contrary to our repeated public statements, wish to block all migration, that is untrue and you will need to retract this. - FChE