From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id U7I0HuU2P2Mq2QYAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 16:13:25 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6BC471E112; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 16:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=xa1jZsYr; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6268B1E0CB for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 16:13:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E4C385E001 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 20:13:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 03E4C385E001 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1665087204; bh=QYJnafEFS2H1PVgDPWMyDS2s7nhJkaDIG+SFK4BZ7J0=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=xa1jZsYrVjghgjugfjb4YtBJ9F3ZDMx1v6//4l5xHs2b+MhSuAfuGW8/OESxCoakJ 0hfOF345IsOZYlq2ydbn2jHobHsHpXQ1osnMHqXd+ifLGpTT2KLoQasZ0X2hDjIs3I u06P/2kddW2mDNVZv4Z5jpMgKu6P4a2WHPlwMrto= Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8211A3857B80; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 20:12:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8211A3857B80 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx 2A128E0E30 Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 16:12:56 -0400 To: Mark Wielaard Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project Message-ID: <20221006201256.run7acqpnjofsqfw@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Wielaard , Overseers mailing list , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> <20221004171007.oc2ot6eu6l24aipn@cgf.cx> <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Christopher Faylor via Gdb Reply-To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Overseers mailing list , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:02:19PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: >...But it would be really nice to hear directly from the Linux >Foundation and the OpenSSF about what exactly they are proposing, which >parts of the proposal are mandatory, which can be mixed and matched, >and how they see this working together with Sourceware becoming a >Software Freedom Conservancy member project. Indeed. The silence from the proponents of this project is puzzling. I wonder if this means there are more non-public negotiations going on somewhere, leaving the community out of the loop. cgf