From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ip1JH7h+PGNhlwUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:43:04 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6D3991E112; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:43:04 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=BqFe71sj; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973761E0CB for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:43:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063A03857424 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 18:43:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 063A03857424 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1664908983; bh=FeaIp5w5jnQJ0AoXYaNxFs9cEayLb25fjJ7GgAUal4w=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=BqFe71sjIwLPrNPHDLT09jaIS6BNl8Ttvvx8PDX9HRBVCWQJcILDX3rzESC7KBUe3 oDOtMR1qdSeFaUHlSGUD1QeQpxa6D+l86y8AQQJEwtP7B4kezzJkyvzMfGgW8BhQYn Ml3cqCcbmAjfHDr5aTj8Ofpk8x3OlrZsnULlMk7c= Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6EF3858C50; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 18:42:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8E6EF3858C50 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx F3C8B114104 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:42:33 -0400 To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project Message-ID: <20221004184233.lcayg3huiqrpbkqd@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Overseers mailing list , gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> <20221004171007.oc2ot6eu6l24aipn@cgf.cx> <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Christopher Faylor via Gdb Reply-To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Overseers mailing list , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , binutils@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:17:14PM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >On 2022-10-04 13:10, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:46:08AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> > I made and shared this copy to dispel any further false speculation of >> > scope creep of the GTI proposal. >> >> Who is doing the false speculation? Do you have a mailing list link? >> It would be interesting to know who's got it wrong. > >Mark asked upthread if content on gnu.org is also going to be migrated over >based on sharing of meeting minutes on the gnu.org domain. I think you mean: >>On Sun Oct 2 20:47:49 GMT 2022, Mark Wielaard wrote: >This does raise the question if you are also proposing migrating >non-sourceware services for projects like the websites of various of >the GNU projects on www.gnu.org or the release archives at the GNU ftp >server (and mirrors) those projects use. Reading the meeting logs (I wasn't there and left this project shortly after the meeting) I don't see anything that directly answers Mark's question. So, to me, this seems like an innocent request for clarification rather than an attempt to push a false speculation. There's no need to go down this rabbit hole, though. Thanks for clarifying. cgf