From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103663 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2020 02:38:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 103613 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2020 02:38:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Joel, joel X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:38:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599BE561A1; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:38:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ux0PdjiihzQo; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:38:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB06C56036; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:38:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45CC383851; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 06:38:01 +0400 (+04) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:38:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils? Message-ID: <20200219023801.GY10825@adacore.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 > It seems like something has to be done with Git hook scriptery to make it > consider gdbserver/ a part of GDB rather than binutils; gdbsupport/ might > be similarly affected. My recent commit spanning gdb/ and gdbserver/ has > triggered an additional message (beyond one to ) > posted to , which shouldn't have happened for such > a commit. I should be the same message with two recipients, but that's indeed a good point. This is something to remember when moving code to the toplevel dir. I've modified the script we use to determine which mailing-list to hit, and marked gdbserver/ and gdbsupport/ as being GDB-only. I did a quick pass over the current directories at toplevel, and didn't see anything else. But if there are other directories not created yet that we are planning on adding, please let me know, and I will take care of it too. -- Joel