From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92863 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2019 10:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 92620 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2019 10:12:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:347 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:12:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCF5C057F96; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-65.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.65]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1471A5D9D2; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:12:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Andrew Burgess Cc: dwk , David Griffiths , GDB Subject: Re: Is nexti confused by pushq? Message-ID: <20190226101245.GA1496753@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20190226073236.GD10887@embecosm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190226073236.GD10887@embecosm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:32:37 +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote: > Of course, this doesn't solve the problem for you, but at least you > know what's going wrong now :) To make it clear the debuggee has wrong/insufficient debug info, its .eh_frame/.debug_frame there should annotate the push (and pop) instructions. Jan