From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130157 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2018 09:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 129441 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2018 09:49:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=him, his X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:49:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A9956207; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 04:49:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QiPOncpJTonN; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 04:49:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FB5117599; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 04:49:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05A4E83307; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:49:15 +0400 (+04) Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:49:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 8.1 released! Message-ID: <20180201094914.72yznaqugcjlkalz@adacore.com> References: <87lggeey0a.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lggeey0a.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 > > Release 8.1 of GDB, the GNU Debugger, is now available via anonymous > > FTP. [...] > > The old school curmudgeon in me loves it that anonymous FTP is mentioned > in first sentence. Is that part really so relevant in the $CURRENT_YEAR? I don't mind removing it. RMS made a request about the text as well, so I sent him the new version for his review. If he approves it, the reference will be gone from this paragraph :). -- Joel