From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-46151-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 124516 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2017 20:10:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 124498 invoked by uid 89); 5 Nov 2017 20:10:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 20:10:48 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA793267D5;	Sun,  5 Nov 2017 20:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com EA793267D5
Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-117-191.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.191])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A6A60602;	Sun,  5 Nov 2017 20:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 20:10:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCSmlFX048GyhC?= <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: why does assert(0) corrupt the stack trace?
Message-ID: <20171105201042.GA29902@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <CAD-N9QVbDJNJXrnsS3PNTvRXvvUK=pB6f+Gpj4WGTSjMoYR9pg@mail.gmail.com> <20171105195410.GA29185@host1.jankratochvil.net> <CAD-N9QX17JssrU=Eo5whDFzLLQVUUb1RidHWwqzUC3ZFY6LGJw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD-N9QX17JssrU=Eo5whDFzLLQVUUb1RidHWwqzUC3ZFY6LGJw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2

On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 21:05:04 +0100, 慕冬亮 wrote:
> If I compile the program with "-O0", this problem may be solved. Yes?

You would need to recompile glibc with -g -O0.  Which I am not sure if it is
even possible.


Jan